News and Announcements
Annual Summer PlotLuck luncheon
We're meeting at a restaurant this time, so you don't have to bring anything except yourself and story ideas to share and/or plot problems to toss around.
Enter the limerick contest. Entries will be read and judged during the event. (family friendly please) Prizes will be awarded for 1st, 2nd & 3rd places.
Come and enjoy seeing old friends and meet new ones.
We want to hear about your current writing project and catch up after the pandemic pause.
900 Airport Fwy, Hurst, TX 76054
Saturday June 4th, 2022
10:00 am .. 12:00 noon
Debunking Common Copyright Myths
There are lot of misconceptions about copyright. We debunk five of the most common ones here.
We had planned to start meeting in person again on August 7th, but Covid said, "Oh no. Nyet, nada."
Back to square 1.
Our Saturday morning Reading and Critique Meetings will be held on the Virtual Critique platform until further notice.
Chekhov's gun is a dramatic principle that states that every element in a story must be necessary, and irrelevant elements should be removed. Elements should not appear to make "false promises" by never coming into play.
"If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there." From Gurlyand's Reminiscences of A. P. Chekhov
Na na, na no wri mo
PlotLuck Summer - 2021
Dear current and long lost TAWW members and friends,
We're getting together for an old fashioned PlotLuck.
Graciously hosted by TAWW member, Jim Barrow.
Saturday, June 5th,
11:00 am .. 1:00pm
Check your email inbox for directions and RSVP.
Looking forward to seeing you soon.
"Trinity Arts Writer's Workshop is the perfect place to get the creative juices flowing for writers of all genres and skill levels. It strikes just the right balance of supportive camaraderie and critical feedback to stretch and build those literary muscles!”
Arissa Utemark - Member
TAWW Offers Free Workshops
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. — Tom Clancy
Over time, intensifiers lose their power to strengthen. The intensifiers awfully and terrible are good examples. Even though these words derive from the powerful words awe and terror, they no longer radiate the same level of gravitas. Through common usage, they have lost their shock value.
To strengthen the intensifying effect, writers (especially in informal writing) often double up their intensifiers. For example:
I love you so so much.
She tried very very hard.
Tomorrow's meeting is so terribly important.
The use of intensifiers is considered by many to be lazy writing, and doubling up intensifiers is unlikely to be permissible in formal correspondence. In formal writing, the level of intensity you need to portray should be achieved through word choice (e.g., by using strong adjectives instead of intensifiers). For example:
It is very tasty.
It is delicious.
(With a strong adjective like delicious, there is no need for an intensifier. In fact, using an intensifier would sound unnatural.)
He took an extremely big risk.
He took a huge risk.
(With a strong adjective like huge, there is no need for an intensifier.)
One effective way to use intensifiers is to limit their use. For example, if you use the word very just once in your document, your readers will believe that very really really does mean very.
Topics from Recent Readings
a 1956 Dodge with push-button transmission
mysterious female traveler kills and cooks a big saber tooth cat
teen-aged recovering alcoholic defends her virginity
African poachers shoot down an aerial tour plane
childhood friends' innocence is interrupted by puberty while skinny dipping
an inquisitive art student takes special interests in a revealing subject
an eighteenth century midwife is entangled in tragedy
survivors of an apocalyptic solar storm escape to the countryside
“Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass.”
― Anton Chekhov